Hot Coffee
$21.58
Price: $21.58
(as of Oct 19, 2024 17:07:28 UTC – Details)
Not only does this video set the record straight on the widely misunderstood court case concerning the woman who in 1992 was seriously burned by a cup of McDonald’s coffee; but it also examines several less notorious but no less devastating cases and uses them all as a platform for a discussion of the tort reform movement. The injured parties and family representatives relate their stories; while legal and medical experts discuss the injuries; evidence; and legal procedures. Filmmaker and former attorney Saladoff skillfully incorporates poignant cases that illustrate the often unjust effects of such reform measures as damage caps and mandatory arbitration contract clauses on the rights of victims. She inserts on-the-street interviews with average citizens to reveal common misconceptions about tort reform; while appearances by Sen. Al Franken and author/lawyer John Grisham help to explain the issues and add celebrity power. The film raises questions about the motives and activities of the American Tort Reform Association and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. The graphic footage of the burns in the McDonald’s case is necessary to put to rest the notion that the victim was simply greedy. Bonus features include an insightful look at how the politically charged language of tort reform was crafted to influence opinion. VERDICT This well-made film goes beyond advocacy group sound bites and provides an intelligible analysis of what tort reform means to consumers; victims; and public figures; it will appeal to consumer protection groups; the legal community; and general audiences interested in protecting their legal rights.–Joan Pedzich; formerly with Harris Beach PLLC; Pittsford; NY Copyright 2012 Reed Business Information.
Is Discontinued By Manufacturer : No
MPAA rating : NR (Not Rated)
Product Dimensions : 0.7 x 7.5 x 5.4 inches; 2.72 ounces
Item model number : NNVG253331
Director : Susan Saladoff
Media Format : NTSC, Multiple Formats, Color
Run time : 1 hour and 29 minutes
Release date : November 1, 2011
Actors : Susan Saladoff, Al Franken, John Grisham, Joanne Doroshow, Stella Liebeck
Producers : Susan Saladoff, Alan Oxman, Carly Hugo
Studio : Docurama
ASIN : B00595W3MO
Number of discs : 1
6 reviews for Hot Coffee
Add a review
You must be logged in to post a review.
majormusiclover –
TORT – MEANS HARM – When a TORT is committed – someone has been harmed in some way..
Essential information is revealed here within this powerful documentary.Here is the detailed unveiling of corporate multi-million-dollar propaganda campaigns,intentionally ment to confuse and brainwash Americans.Photo’s are shown here of the deep burns Stella Liebeck suffered in the McDonald’s hot coffee incident.She was 79 at the time, she required numerous skin graphs and nearly died.But the industry twisted the case to make it the poster child for frivolous lawsuits.Meanwhile McDonald’s kept a low profile on the fact that they previously had,between January 1983 to March 1992, over 700 burn cases.Corporations have armed themselves with these tactics,plus powerful unrelenting lobbing, and friends in high places.They have extensively campaigned to affect jury’s and senator’s to set cap’s on damage awards.And in addition they have among other things,actually managed to change a CRUCIAL part of our 200 year old constitution of the United States.Thus they unbound themselves from prior limits,and now can give unlimited donations to the politician’s who will support their issues.In other words, they control the add campaigns which ultimately sway which politicians American’s vote for.Opening this floodgate means corporations literally hold the future of most American’s in their hands.This documentary is a stunning and reveiling well segmented account of the battle over Tort reform,and what IS happening to America.Reveiled here are many devices and methods that are used.Documented footage shows that the whole point of the Tort reform is to keep the public from accessing the courts.All public, no matter if frivolous or honest.Camera’s follow individuals as they try to access the courts for restitution for the wrongs done to them.That’s when they find out the true meaning of Tort “reform” and what’s happened to their rights.U.S. maps are high-lighted to show which states have which caps on damages, there can be three kinds:Punitive damages,Non-economic,Total caps.Each category is explained.Another way to block a person’s right to sue,is when you agree whether you know it or not to ‘arritration’.This common tactic is exposed and explained.Information is given about the immensely large,extremly powerful and very corrupt U.S. Chamber of Commerce.This is not a government agency, it’s an enormous mass of corporations.They are exposed for who they are, how they sway elections, and what their intent is.This is likely the most accurate, deeply informative documentary you’ll ever have an opportunity to own.Every household should watch this documentary, and understand it’s impact.
Nanciejeanne –
If you think you know the McDonald’s spilled coffee case (and others)…..you probably don’t.
I think we all have heard of the McDonald’s coffee lawsuit and how it became the poster child for “frivolous” lawsuits. What we don’t always think of though, is who is paying for the promotion of this notion of “frivolity?” And why are they interested?Just like so many things, this documentary shows that we need to follow the money. One of the most important points was that we (as citizens) really can only confront and “play fair” with huge companies and insurance industries in court. Things like tort reform and binding arbitration can take those rights away from us and favor the big companies. Why do these laws pass? Aggressive marketing campaigns to convince us. And well-funded elections to favor business-friendly candidates. What is scary is, that we have the right to trials, and juries decide what’s fair. But the juries given to us by our constitution are having their (and our) power away by putting the decisions in the hands of the ones with the most money. What does some “bought” congressman from some other state know about MY injury or death? And if they can’t make (yet) the federal government set limits, they will go to each state. So someone funded by say, General Electric in my state now can decide that I can only get x amount of dollars no matter what happens to me as a result of a faulty General Electric product. Does that seem fair? Why does the legislative branch now get to take the place of a jury? And they always say that these things will “save us money” but they haven’t shown that to be true at all. Maybe saved “some” people money.It is hard for me to always realize the impact big money has on the way people (even me) think. I don’t always realize that “opinions” I thought I had formed, have been molded by lots and lots of intentional marketing for the with a specific purpose. It makes me wonder what other things I “think” have been decided for me already! Maybe disagree with parts or even ALL of it, but it is important to get both sides of things to be a better informed thinker.
ERIK –
Slow in parts but worth checking out
There are a few different stories told in this documentary and some are more interesting than others. Each story is loosely tied together based on the idea that cooperate interests are infiltrating the judicial system and politics. I do think the most interesting details involve the McDonald’s Hot Coffee case. So many of the details of the case were misconstrued by the media and resulted in many of our civil liberties being striped away which is illustrated in poignant detail in the movie. The story teller clearly has an agenda but does a solid job of getting their point across. I believe the Hot Coffee case stays with me because it is the least heavy handed approach to story telling done in the documentary. The two other cases involved anecdotal stories about a child being having severe brain injury due to a doctors negligence and not being fully compensated due to tort reform laws and also a story of a female contractor who was sexually assaulted in Iraq who is fighting to break a binding arbitration employment agreement. I’m don’t know if it’s my connection to the stories or not but each of these seemed more emotionally manipulative then the initial story of the Hot Coffee lawsuit.
Giovinna –
An eye-opener. When you think you know something for sure someone who actually has studied the situation sets you straight. You remember, when you see reporting like this, what journalism is supposed to be and its importance in educating those of us most affected by the power of the corporate ,political and economic overlords.
Lori –
I thought I knew about the McDonalds coffee story, but found out I only knew what the corporations wanted people to know. The McD coffee story is only one part of the documentary, they are all really interesting and informative. I would recommend this movie quite strongly.
Canid –
a must see for all those who ‘think’ they know what happened in this famous case